Dynamical ensembles equivalence in fluid mechanics
Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, ISSN: 0167-2789, Vol: 105, Issue: 1, Page: 163-184
1997
- 44Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
An attempt to put together various theoretical, mathematical, or experimental results recently developed in apparently unrelated subjects. Namely Ruelle's (1980) approach to turbulence, the body of Nosé-Hoover type of molecular dynamics experiments, (Evans and Morriss, 1990; Evans et al., 1993; Bonetto et al., 1996), mathematical results on Lyapunov exponents (the pairing rule, Dressler (1988) and Dettman and Morriss (1995)) and experimental results on them (Sarman et al., 1992; Bohr et al., 1996), theoretical as well as mathematical results on fluctuations, Frisch and Parisi (1984) (multifractality), and Gallavoti and Cohen (1995) (chaotic hypothesis). The key idea that we try to clarify is that of “dynamical ensembles”, as a generalization of the classical “equilibrium ensembles”, arguing that they should be identified with the SRB distributions and that they share several properties with the classical ensembles. Most of the results invoked here did not deal directly with the Navier-Stokes equations and yet they seem to have a lot to do with them (as we shall argue): here the discussion will focus on the Navier-Stokes and dissipative Euler equations with the aim of proposing several experiments apt to test the equivalence of dynamical ensembles and the chaotic hypothesis. The ideas developed, to a great extent, from the efforts put in interpreting the experimental results in (Bonetto et al., 1996).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167278996002369; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2789(96)00236-9; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0003102422&origin=inward; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167278996002369; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167278996002369?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167278996002369?httpAccept=text/plain; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167278996002369; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167278996002369?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167278996002369?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2789%2896%2900236-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2789%2896%2900236-9
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know