Improved estimation of clutter properties in speckled imagery
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, ISSN: 0167-9473, Vol: 40, Issue: 4, Page: 801-824
2002
- 42Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper's aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of bootstrap methods in improving estimation of clutter properties in speckled imagery. Estimation is performed by standard maximum likelihood methods. We show that estimators obtained this way can be quite biased in finite samples, and develop bias correction schemes using bootstrap resampling. In particular, we propose a bootstrapping scheme which is an adaptation of that proposed by Efron (J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 85 (1990) 79). The proposed bootstrap does not require the quantity of interest to have closed form, as does Efron's original proposal. The adaptation we suggest is particularly important since the maximum likelihood estimator of interest does not have a closed form. We show that this particular bootstrapping scheme outperforms alternative forms of bias reduction mechanisms, thus delivering more accurate inference. We also consider interval estimation using bootstrap methods, and show that a particular parametric bootstrap-based confidence interval is typically more reliable than both the asymptotic confidence interval and other bootstrap-based confidence intervals. An application to real data is presented and discussed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947302001020; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9473(02)00102-0; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0037191017&origin=inward; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167947302001020; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167947302001020?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167947302001020?httpAccept=text/plain; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167947302001020; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167947302001020?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167947302001020?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9473%2802%2900102-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9473%2802%2900102-0
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know