The global, regional, and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017
The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, ISSN: 2468-1253, Vol: 5, Issue: 1, Page: 17-30
2020
- 1,563Citations
- 2,001Captures
- 427Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1,563
- Citation Indexes1,556
- 1,556
- CrossRef645
- Policy Citations6
- Policy Citation6
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Captures2,001
- Readers2,001
- 2,001
- Mentions427
- News Mentions417
- News417
- Blog Mentions10
- Blog10
Most Recent News
Explained: What Is IBD, The Incurable Gut Problem That Has Baffled Celebrities And Science?
IBD or Inflammatory Bowel Disease is one of those medical afflictions that sounds innocuous enough at first but is far more insidious. L-R: Celebrities living
Article Description
The burden of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising globally, with substantial variation in levels and trends of disease in different countries and regions. Understanding these geographical differences is crucial for formulating effective strategies for preventing and treating IBD. We report the prevalence, mortality, and overall burden of IBD in 195 countries and territories between 1990 and 2017, based on data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017. We modelled mortality due to IBD using a standard Cause of Death Ensemble model including data mainly from vital registrations. To estimate the non-fatal burden, we used data presented in primary studies, hospital discharges, and claims data, and used DisMod-MR 2.1, a Bayesian meta-regression tool, to ensure consistency between measures. Mortality, prevalence, years of life lost (YLLs) due to premature death, years lived with disability (YLDs), and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) were estimated. All of the estimates were reported as numbers and rates per 100 000 population, with 95% uncertainty intervals (UI). In 2017, there were 6·8 million (95% UI 6·4–7·3) cases of IBD globally. The age-standardised prevalence rate increased from 79·5 (75·9–83·5) per 100 000 population in 1990 to 84·3 (79·2–89·9) per 100 000 population in 2017. The age-standardised death rate decreased from 0·61 (0·55–0·69) per 100 000 population in 1990 to 0·51 (0·42–0·54) per 100 000 population in 2017. At the GBD regional level, the highest age-standardised prevalence rate in 2017 occurred in high-income North America (422·0 [398·7–446·1] per 100 000) and the lowest age-standardised prevalence rates were observed in the Caribbean (6·7 [6·3–7·2] per 100 000 population). High Socio-demographic Index (SDI) locations had the highest age-standardised prevalence rate, while low SDI regions had the lowest age-standardised prevalence rate. At the national level, the USA had the highest age-standardised prevalence rate (464·5 [438·6–490·9] per 100 000 population), followed by the UK (449·6 [420·6–481·6] per 100 000). Vanuatu had the highest age-standardised death rate in 2017 (1·8 [0·8–3·2] per 100 000 population) and Singapore had the lowest (0·08 [0·06–0·14] per 100 000 population). The total YLDs attributed to IBD almost doubled over the study period, from 0·56 million (0·39–0·77) in 1990 to 1·02 million (0·71–1·38) in 2017. The age-standardised rate of DALYs decreased from 26·5 (21·0–33·0) per 100 000 population in 1990 to 23·2 (19·1–27·8) per 100 000 population in 2017. The prevalence of IBD increased substantially in many regions from 1990 to 2017, which might pose a substantial social and economic burden on governments and health systems in the coming years. Our findings can be useful for policy makers developing strategies to tackle IBD, including the education of specialised personnel to address the burden of this complex disease. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468125319303334; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30333-4; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075968413&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31648971; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468125319303334; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253%2819%2930333-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253%2819%2930333-4; https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(19)30333-4/fulltext; http://www.thelancet.com/article/S2468125319303334/abstract; http://www.thelancet.com/article/S2468125319303334/fulltext; http://www.thelancet.com/article/S2468125319303334/pdf; https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(19)30333-4/abstract; https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(19)30333-4/fulltext#seccestitle150; https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(19)30333-4/fulltext#seccestitle140; https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(19)30333-4/fulltext#.XgZk8g4IcAo.twitter; https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(19)30333-4/fulltext?utm_campaign=uegw19&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social; https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(19)30333-4/fulltext#.Xc2_iQXi2GY.twitter
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know