Environmental impact assessment of battery storage
Environmental Assessment of Renewable Energy Conversion Technologies, Page: 277-302
2022
- 1Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
The environmental impacts of different types of battery storage have been widely investigated by considering a part of their life cycle. These investigations assisted in augmenting the environmental performances of the battery storage in many ways. However, so far, little research is conducted on assessing the probable environmental effects of batteries considering their lifespan, from raw material extraction to end-of-life disposal. Therefore, this work considers the environmental profiles evaluation of lithium-ion (Li-ion), sodium chloride (NaCl), and nickel-metal hydride (NiMH) battery storage, considering the whole lifetime. The impacts of these batteries are estimated using Impact 2002+, EcoPoints 97, and cumulative energy demand methods. The environmental effects are evaluated under many indicators like carcinogens, noncarcinogens, respiratory inorganics, ionizing radiation, ozone layer depletion, aquatic ecotoxicity, land occupation, mineral extraction, nonrenewable energy, terrestrial ecotoxicity, respiratory organics, and global warming. The impacts are also assessed for the end-point categories of human health, ecosystem quality, climate change, and resources. Moreover, the overall metal emissions such as mercury, zinc, cadmium, lead, copper, and greenhouse gas emissions such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxide, sulfur oxide, and ammonia are also estimated by the authors for Li-ion, NaCl, and NiMH battery storage. All the findings are compared to realize, which options are superior concerning the environment. The results reveal a significant environmental impact caused by NiMH batteries compared to Li-ion batteries. These impacts are the amount of toxic chemical elements present as a constituent of NiMH batteries. It can be anticipated that a better environmental performance can be achieved through optimization, especially by cautiously picking the constituents, taking into account the toxicity aspects, and minimizing the impacts related to these chemicals.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128171110000012; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-817111-0.00001-2; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85138387704&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128171110000012; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-817111-0.00001-2
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know