Novel detection methods and data triangulation for novel psychoactive substances (NPS)
Novel Psychoactive Substances, Page: 131-156
2022
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Monitoring tools for novel psychoactive substances (NPS) have become increasingly sophisticated to keep pace with a highly innovative and dynamic NPS market. The overall picture of drug use cannot be obtained from any one single detection method with each highlighting a partial aspect of drug use prevalence or availability. Analysis of seizure or amnesty bin drug samples and wastewater/pooled urine provides knowledge of the main classes of substances used but not data relating to prevalence, frequency of use or user demographic. This may instead be captured by general or target population surveys - but these lack information on patterns of acute toxicity and are limited by uncertainties of the substances actually being used and participant recall reliability. These may be overcome by the analysis of biological specimens used in conjunction with epidemiological studies, however, large scale testing in this way is neither feasible nor practical. Triangulating the outcomes of multiple approaches used in combination may therefore help to improve the detection of NPS and their patterns of use across different settings.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128187883000176; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818788-3.00017-6; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126767194&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128187883000176; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:B9780128187883000176?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:B9780128187883000176?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818788-3.00017-6
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know