Removal of heavy metals by microbial communities
Wastewater Treatment Reactors, Page: 537-566
2021
- 14Citations
- 27Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
A scarcity for clean water has drawn global attention and thus various technologies for heavy metal removal from water are being explored and designed to ensure water recovery/recycle/reuse. Effective and successful water treatment processes have been aimed toward exploiting alternative sources of water (apart from freshwater) such as seawater, stormwater, wastewater, and industrial effluents. Conventional technologies like adsorption, filtration, chemical precipitation, reverse osmosis, ion exchange, and membrane separations are expensive and have several limitations. Thus various microbial communities that include especially bacteria, yeasts, and fungi have received increasing attention for heavy metal removal and recovery due to their efficient biosorption capacity. Moreover, biological processes for heavy metal removal involve low costs and are environment-friendly, reusable, and easy to scale up. The surface of microbial biosorbents provide metal-binding functional sites that include carboxyl, imidazole, sulfydryl, amino, phosphate, sulfate, thioether, phenol, carbonyl, amide, and hydroxyl moieties. In this chapter, we present an elaborate account of several bacterial communities from genus Geospirillum, Geospirillum, Desulfutomaculum, Bacillus, Crysiogenes, Pseudomonas, Rhodopseudomonas, Ralstonia, Thiomonas, etc., for the effective removal of toxic metal ions like arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, and manganese. Similarly, applications of fungus and yeasts from the genera Penicillium, Rhodosporidium, Schizosaccharomyces, Torulopsis, Aspergillus, Saccharophagus, Saccharomyces, etc, are also discussed. Further, various cellular mechanisms, genes, and enzymes involved in microbial metal removal technology are presented that can be used for designing genetically engineered microbes. Lastly, commercial biosorbents which may be inexpensive and more efficient alternatives for the removal of toxic metals from aqueous solutions are discussed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128239919000162; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-823991-9.00016-2; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85127703367&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128239919000162; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-823991-9.00016-2
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know