Flood damage assessment with multitemporal earth observation SAR satellite images: A case of coastal flooding in Southern Thailand
Disaster Resilience and Sustainability, Page: 265-276
2021
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Book Chapter Description
Estimation of economic loss due to flood often becomes necessary for flood damage assessment. Conventional practices to estimate damage by postflood survey are laborious and time-consuming. This study presents a framework of rapid estimation of flood damage using earth observation satellite data to minimize the time and efforts for damage assessment. The study encompasses the case of severe coastal flooding in Nakhon Si Thammarat Province in Southern Thailand in January 2019. Land use-land cover (LULC) maps of study sites are prepared using Random Forest (RF) classification in Google Earth Engine (GEE) to classify cropland and built-up areas. For this case study, Sentinel-1C-band synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) data provided by ESA (European Space Agency) were used. The datasets were taken before and after the flood incident and were processed using Sentinel Toolbox. Flood inundation maps generated using Kittlerand and Illingworth’s automatic thresholding algorithm are validated using Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission flood datasets. LULC maps are overlaid on flood inundation maps to assess the agricultural and habitat loss in the study area using Sentinel-1 SAR data. This study shows effectiveness of Sentinel-1C-band SAR for flood inundation mapping and land cover classification and cross-validates the previous studies that proved the effectiveness of Sentinel-1 data. Performance evaluation using accuracy assessment proves that this approach can be used for accurate estimation of agriculture losses/risks caused by coastal flooding.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323851954000214; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-85195-4.00021-4; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85127713024&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780323851954000214; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:B9780323851954000214?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:B9780323851954000214?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-85195-4.00021-4
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know