Satellite sensors, machine learning, and river channel unit types: A review
Current Directions in Water Scarcity Research, ISSN: 2542-7946, Vol: 7, Page: 117-132
2022
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Book Chapter Description
Understanding spatial arrangement and linkages of distinct morphological groups within a larger landscape mosaic will lead to a more generalized conceptual framework for interpreting fluvial systems. The focus of this chapter is on the mapping and interpretation of river channel unit types using satellite sensors and machine algorithms. Studies on river channels using remote sensing are beginning to emerge; however, very few to no studies have focused on medium- to small-scale basins. This is understandable due to the spatial resolutions of freely available Earth Observation products. However, with various pan sharpening techniques, issues around spatial resolution are being resolved albeit not without care and caution. The top five selected features for channel unit types prediction using random forest are cross-sectional area, total stream power, wetted perimeter, band 5, and discharge, while for kNN are slope, discharge, hydraulic radius, cross-sectional area, and depth. The choice of the Near-Infrared Band in random forest suggests the possibility of the combination of bands with morphological variables in discriminating channel unit types. Indices have been developed in environmental studies even though most of these indices are in combination with other bands, and there is the possibility to explore combining band 5 with other bands or with channel morphological variables.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know