DSS for blockchain technology using explainable multiagent system
XAI Based Intelligent Systems for Society 5.0, Page: 153-172
2024
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures7
- Readers7
Book Chapter Description
Artificial intelligence (AI) advancements are benefiting a wide range of disciplines. Multiagent systems (MASs) are rapidly used in vital sectors such as medicine, driverless cars, prison reform, and stock institutions. As a result of this development, there is a rising interconnectedness between AI and human civilization. As a result, various concerns have been expressed about the user acceptability of AI agents. One of the essential concerns is trust issues, mainly related to their absence of understandability. In past decades, the emphasis has been on achieving the best productivity possible at the price of generalization ability. It resulted in extraordinary video processing, computational linguistics, and decision-making systems breakthroughs. However, the critical problems raised by society's unwillingness to embrace AI-based judgments could result in whole new movements and innovations that promote predictability, legitimacy, and user-centricity. This study suggests a collaborative method incorporating “blockchain technology” (BCT) and explains its ability in the MAS decision-making procedure. By doing so, present opaque decision-making procedures may be improved, better visible and secured, and hence more dependable from the perspective of the specific user. Several case studies employing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are also presented. Finally, the study analyses trust-based networks' functions, balancing, and exchange of understandability and BCT.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323953153000012; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-95315-3.00001-2; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189573168&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780323953153000012; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-95315-3.00001-2
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know