Bioleaching of metals from various waste resources
Resource Recovery in Industrial Waste Waters, Page: 115-141
2023
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Book Chapter Description
The accumulation of waste from different sources such as industries, mine tailing, electronic waste, and sewage sludge is a serious environmental challenge. Since waste from the sources mentioned above contains a range of metals, research has been carried out to develop sustainable and environmentally friendly methods for recovering heavy metals (e.g., Fe, Co, Li, and P). Compared to the traditional method, bioleaching is considered a more sustainable method for metal recovery, but its efficiency must be improved for widespread practical applications. This chapter critically evaluates the current status of the bioleaching process for heavy metal recovery by summarizing the bioleaching process’s historical perspective, principles, and associated mechanisms. The overview of the existing literature indicates that the bioleaching process is influenced by microbial species and environmental factors (e.g., pH, redox potential, and temperature). In addition, this chapter discusses metal recovery versus different sources and bioleaching reactor design at the laboratory and industrial scale. The economics and sustainability of the bioleaching process are reviewed, and future research needs are outlined.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323953276000087; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-95327-6.00008-7; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85176840571&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780323953276000087; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-95327-6.00008-7
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know