Therapeutic potential of genome editing tools in neurodegenerative diseases
Genome Editing for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Page: 1-17
2025
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Book Chapter Description
Progressive functional impairment of certain populations of neurons is a hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) like Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, tauopathies, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The most prominent cytological feature of degenerating neurons is pathogenic aggregates of misfolded proteins in the cytoplasm, which hamper the proper development and functioning of neuronal cells. Different approaches have been implemented to study the mechanism of pathogenesis and explore the therapeutics of different NDs. Genome editing tools are the most powerful and widely used approach to studying NDs by inducing desired modifications at the targeted genome site, offering a more promising approach to treatment than conventional techniques. This chapter covers the recent developments in the three main genome editing techniques, including transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9). Despite the potential benefits of these editing tools, challenges like selecting the most suitable delivery techniques, safety issues, off-target impacts, and enhanced mosaicism must be addressed to maximize their potential in treating NDs.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know