From the Evolution of Protein Sequences Able to Resist Self-Assembly to the Prediction of Aggregation Propensity
International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology, ISSN: 1937-6448, Vol: 329, Page: 1-47
2017
- 13Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- CrossRef10
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Article Description
Folding of polypeptide chains into biologically active entities is an astonishingly complex process, determined by the nature and the sequence of residues emerging from ribosomes. While it has been long believed that evolution has pressed genomes so that specific sequences could adopt unique, functional three-dimensional folds, it is now clear that complex protein machineries act as quality control system and supervise folding. Notwithstanding that, events such as erroneous folding, partial folding, or misfolding are frequent during the life of a cell or a whole organism, and they can escape controls. One of the possible outcomes of this misbehavior is cross-β aggregation, a super secondary structure which represents the hallmark of self-assembled, well organized, and extremely ordered structures termed amyloid fibrils. What if evolution would have not taken into account such possibilities? Twenty years of research point toward the idea that, in fact, evolution has constantly supervised the risk of errors and minimized their impact. In this review we tried to survey the major findings in the amyloid field, trying to describe what the real pitfalls of protein folding are—from an evolutionary perspective—and how sequence and structural features have evolved to balance the need for perfect, dynamic, functionally efficient structures, and the detrimental effects implicit in the dangerous process of folding. We will discuss how the knowledge obtained from these studies has been employed to produce computational methods able to assess, predict, and discriminate the aggregation properties of protein sequences.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1937644816300776; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.ircmb.2016.08.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85005938323&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28109326; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1937644816300776; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.ircmb.2016.08.008
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know