Stable fixed points of combinatorial threshold-linear networks
Advances in Applied Mathematics, ISSN: 0196-8858, Vol: 154, Page: 102652
2024
- 5Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
Combinatorial threshold-linear networks (CTLNs) are a special class of recurrent neural networks whose dynamics are tightly controlled by an underlying directed graph. Recurrent networks have long been used as models for associative memory and pattern completion, with stable fixed points playing the role of stored memory patterns in the network. In prior work, we showed that target-free cliques of the graph correspond to stable fixed points of the dynamics, and we conjectured that these are the only stable fixed points possible [19,8]. In this paper, we prove that the conjecture holds in a variety of special cases, including for networks with very strong inhibition and graphs of size n≤4. We also provide further evidence for the conjecture by showing that sparse graphs and graphs that are nearly cliques can never support stable fixed points. Finally, we translate some results from extremal combinatorics to obtain an upper bound on the number of stable fixed points of CTLNs in cases where the conjecture holds.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196885823001707; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aam.2023.102652; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85179762420&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38250671; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0196885823001707; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aam.2023.102652
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know