Application of 3D-printed scabbard-like sorbent for sample preparation in bioanalysis expanded to 96-wellplate high-throughput format
Analytica Chimica Acta, ISSN: 0003-2670, Vol: 1081, Page: 1-5
2019
- 33Citations
- 64Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations33
- Citation Indexes33
- 33
- CrossRef9
- Captures64
- Readers64
- 64
Article Description
Modern bioanalysis, which involves the quantitative and qualitative determination of small-molecule endogenous and exogenous substances in biological samples, is a powerful and useful tool that can generate valuable information related to many areas connected with human health and quality of life. Although LC-MS and GC-MS are widely viewed as the gold standards for many bioanalytical tasks, the scientific community has not abandoned its search for newer, more efficient, and more inexpensive methods of performing extraction as a sample preparation step before final analysis. Recent research showing the immense potential of 3D printing compelled our group to explore how this technology could be applied to techniques used in analytical chemistry. In particular, 3D printing offers three promising advantages: availability, low cost of materials and equipment, and the ability to fabricate objects of nearly any shape to suit the needs of a given application. Previously, we demonstrated that a commercial 3D material (LAY-FOMM) can function as a chemically active object that enables the reversible sorption of the antidiabetic drug, glimepiride, and endogenous steroids. In this report, we use a 3D printer to fabricate sorbents with a scabbard-like shape for use with a 96-blade system, which, along with the use of a 96-well plate, allows multiple extractions to be performed simultaneously. In order to assess the relative benefits of this 3D printed approach, we compare the performance of the proposed LAY-FOMM-based sorbent to that of the widely used C18 sorbent. Although the LAY-FOMM sorbent showed lower extraction recovery rates than the C18 sorbent, all of the other validation parameters suggest that it is suitable for use in high-throughput analysis of steroids in human plasma.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267019307068; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.05.078; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85066946745&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31446946; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003267019307068; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.05.078
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know