Renewable sorbent dispersive solid phase extraction automated by Lab-In-Syringe using magnetite-functionalized hydrophilic-lipophilic balanced sorbent coupled online to HPLC for determination of surface water contaminants
Analytica Chimica Acta, ISSN: 0003-2670, Vol: 1210, Page: 339874
2022
- 23Citations
- 67Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef11
- Captures67
- Readers67
- 67
Article Description
An automated methodology for magnetic dispersive solid phase microextraction integrating bead injection approach for renewable sorbent introduction is presented for the first time and was successfully applied to the enrichment of water contaminants. For this purpose, a simple procedure was developed for the functionalization of commercial SupelTM-Select HLB (Hydrophilic modified styrene polymer) sorbent beads that allowed embedding magnetite nanoparticles (Fe 3 O 4 ). The sorbent was then used in a dispersive solid phase extraction procedure that was carried out entirely inside the void of an automatic syringe pump following the flow-batch concept of Lab-In-Syringe including automated renewal of the sorbent for each analysis. Mixing processes, sorbent dispersion, and sorbent recovery were enabled by using a strong magnetic stirring bar, fabricated from a 3D printed polypropylene casing and neodymium magnets, inside the syringe. The final extract was submitted to online coupled liquid chromatography with spectrometric detection. System and methodology were applied to determine mebendazole, bisphenol A, benzyl 4-hydroxybenzoate, diclofenac, and triclosan selected as models from different groups of environmental contaminants of current concern. Experimental parameters including extraction and elution times, composition and volume of eluent, and bead recollection were optimized. Required system elements were produced by 3D printing. Enlarging the sample volume by repeated extraction to enhance the sensitivity of the method was studied. Using double extraction from 3.5 mL, limits of detection ranged from 1.2 μg L −1 to 6.5 μg L −1 with an RSD (n = 6) value less than 7% for all the analytes at 25 μg L −1 level. The method was linear in the range of 5–200 μg L −1 and was successfully implemented for the analysis of surface waters with analyte recoveries ranging from 78.4% to 105.6%.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267022004457; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2022.339874; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129111676&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35595360; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003267022004457; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2022.339874
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know