Which Types of Facebook Posts Yield the Best Response for Radiology Education: A One-Year Analysis of What We Learned
Academic Radiology, ISSN: 1076-6332, Vol: 30, Issue: 6, Page: 1200-1209
2023
- 3Citations
- 9Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Captures9
- Readers9
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Researchers from Johns Hopkins University Hospital Report Details of New Studies and Findings in the Area of Education (Which Types of Facebook Posts Yield the Best Response for Radiology Education: a One-year Analysis of What We Learned)
2023 JUL 07 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Education Daily Report -- Investigators discuss new findings in Education. According to news
Article Description
We post several times daily on our Facebook page, CTisus, to educate radiology students and professionals globally. We aimed to determine how our data compared for different types of posts and ascertain the popularity of videos versus case images, illustrations versus case images, and whether cinematic rendering performed better than traditional computed tomography. We exported data for one year's worth of Facebook posts (November 1, 2020 to October 31, 2021) and categorized posts into 18 types. Our primary outcome was popularity of each post, measured by “reach” and “engagement” counts provided by Facebook. Among the 9057 posts exported, “just for fun” posts performed the best, followed by quiz images. Case images performed significantly better than instructional videos ( p < 0.0001). However, the opposite was true for engagement, where instructional videos performed significantly better than case images ( p = 0.0012). For both reach and engagement, case images performed better than medical illustrations ( p < 0.0001). For both reach ( p < 0.0005) and engagement ( p < 0.0001), traditional computed tomography performed significantly better than cinematic rendering. All video types had better engagement than case images and medical illustrations ( p < 0.0001) and both had significantly better engagement than text ( p < 0.0001). Our results may help other educators choose what types of content to create and post on social media to achieve the best impact on learners.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633222003695; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.06.023; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85134847463&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902293; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1076633222003695; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.06.023
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know