Optical borehole-wall analysis – Useful method for planetary environment reconstruction
Acta Astronautica, ISSN: 0094-5765, Vol: 196, Page: 57-72
2022
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
A borehole-wall scanner was developed with 0.1 mm spatial resolution and used to analyse borehole surfaces in Earth analogue tests to support the drilling of ExoMars 2020 rover and other future missions. Altogether 13 field sites were analysed, and the results were interpreted together with laboratory measurements of optical, infrared and Raman instruments of the acquired samples. The tests show the instrument and method is useful to identify grains, structural features and their spatial distribution along the strata. A range of borehole-wall features could be identified, including separated grains (with identified size, shape, colour and albedo), aggregates, layering, deformation features, voids left behind after fallen out grains. Two basic lithological types could be identified: the heterogeneous fragile sedimentary, and the homogeneous stronger volcanic/magmatic rocks. The drilling produced artefacts such as smearing of soft material or aggregation of existing small grains could that provide information on the presence of plastic material. The experiences of borehole-wall analysis revealed that walls usually show highly heterogeneous appearance at all spatial scales – but the crushed samples were homogeneous, as structural information were lost during the sample crushing. Thus optical scanning of drilled holes provide important information that we propose should be used during sample acquisition for future lunar drilling and Mars Sample Return.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009457652200145X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.03.034; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128284416&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S009457652200145X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.03.034
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know