Knowledge graph-based mapping and recommendation to automate life cycle assessment
Advanced Engineering Informatics, ISSN: 1474-0346, Vol: 62, Page: 102752
2024
- 1Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The increasing global attention on environmental issues has heightened the demand for a quantitative evaluation of environmental impacts, which primarily relies on using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Despite the availability of foreground data from enterprises and the use of existing LCA software to streamline the executing LCA process, LCA practitioners still grapple with the time-consuming task of querying domain knowledge, selecting background data, and entering numerous parameters into the LCA software. To enhance the efficiency and overall performance of LCA-based evaluations, this paper introduces a knowledge graph-based method towards automated LCA. This method aims to recommend background datasets, encompassing flows and processes, and to automate life cycle modeling and LCA calculations. The proposed approach demonstrates significant improvements, with a flow recommendation Precision@10 of 79.52%, surpassing current search engines by 4.26 times, and a corresponding 2.45 times reduction in response time within the Top 10 results. Furthermore, processes are ranked based on the knowledge graph and geographical inclusion relationships. This aids in extracting system boundaries and functional units, facilitating process recommendations and sup-porting decision-making. After obtaining the life cycle inventory (LCI), an open-source LCA software, OpenLCA, is utilized to extend and refine the automated life cycle modeling and calculations. The proposed method is validated through a case study on an electrical product, and a prototype system is designed to ensure straightforward result interpretation. In conclusion, this method can efficiently select background dataset, automate life cycle modeling and LCA calculation, and improve the readability of LCA results.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034624004002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102752; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85200781858&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1474034624004002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102752
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know