Reduced nitrate leaching from an Irish cropland soil under non-inversion tillage with cover cropping greatly outweighs increased dissolved organic nitrogen leaching
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, ISSN: 0167-8809, Vol: 265, Page: 340-349
2018
- 20Citations
- 37Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Reduced tillage and cover cropping are common measures to minimize leaching losses of nutrients from cropland soils. While the efficiency of these measures for reducing inorganic N leaching has been studied intensively, their effect on dissolved, organically-bound nitrogen (DON) remains unclear. In this study, leaching of nitrate, ammonium and DON from spring barley-based cropping systems, subject to either conventional management (CT = inversion tillage with a winter fallow period), or non-inversion tillage with a winter mustard cover crop (NIT + CC), were assessed using suction cup sampling and modelled drainage volumes. Total dissolved nitrogen losses with drainage from the NIT + CC treatment (2.5 ± 0.2 g N m −2 yr −1 ) were considerably smaller than those from the conventional treatment with fallow (13.9 ± 0.7 g N m −2 yr −1 ). As drainage volumes were similar between treatments, differences in total N leaching were mainly associated with larger nitrate concentrations under CT (23.0 ± 1.1 mg N L −1 ) than under the NIT + CC treatment (5.1 ± 0.3 mg N L −1 ). The average contribution of DON to total dissolved nitrogen concentration was 3% within the CT treatment, but rose to 19% within the NIT + CC treatment, which was primarily due to the strong reduction in nitrate and to a lesser extent due to the higher concentrations of DON within the NIT + CC treatment (NIT + CC: 0.52 ± 0.04, CT: 0.33 ± 0.04 mg N L −1 ). Averaged over the two-year study period, the CT system showed a net loss of 9.4 g N m −2 yr − 1 whilst an N surplus of 1.7 g N m −2 yr −1 was observed for the NIT + CC system. Here DON accounted for 11% of total N leaching, supporting the notion that it can be an important component of dissolved N losses in agroecosystems. By neglecting DON leaching the N-surplus under NIT + CC would have been overestimated by 18%. In conclusion, our results show that the capacity of winter cover cropping in combination with non-inversion tillage to reduce nitrate leaching far outweighed the higher leaching losses of DON observed. The quantification of DON losses, however, may be essential for a complete picture of the N balance of these and similar cropping systems.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880918302652; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.06.031; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85049465401&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167880918302652; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.06.031
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know