PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Greenhouse gas emissions and crop yield in no-tillage systems: A meta-analysis

Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, ISSN: 0167-8809, Vol: 268, Page: 144-153
2018
  • 183
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 304
    Captures
  • 2
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    183
    • Citation Indexes
      179
    • Policy Citations
      4
      • Policy Citation
        4
  • Captures
    304
  • Mentions
    2
    • News Mentions
      2
      • News
        2

Most Recent News

Can regenerative wool make fashion more sustainable?

Wool is considered a miracle fabric in the fashion industry because it is stronger than most fibers, requires less washingand is recyclable, says Tonti. “It’s

Article Description

No-tillage (NT) has been touted as one of several climate-smart agriculture (CSA) management practices that improve food security and enhance agroecosystem resilience to climate change. However, the sustainable effectiveness of NT greatly depends on trade-offs between NT-induced changes in crop yield and greenhouse gas (GHG, i.e. CH 4, CO 2, and N 2 O) emissions. Such trade-offs are regulated by climate fluctuations and heterogeneous soil conditions and have not been well addressed. Supporting CSA management decisions requires advancing our understanding of how NT affects crop yield and GHG emissions in different agroecological regions. In this study, a meta-analysis was conducted using 740 paired measurements from 90 peer-reviewed articles to assess the effects of NT on crop yield, GHG emissions, and the global warming potential (GWP) of major cereal cropping systems. Compared to conventional tillage (CT), NT reduced in GHG emissions and increased crop yield in dry, but not humid, climates, and reduced in the GWP at sites with acidic soils. Across different cropping systems, NT enhanced barley yield by 49%, particularly in dry climates, and it decreased the GWP of rice fields through a 22% reduction in both CO 2 and CH 4 emissions. Our synthesis suggests that NT is an effective CSA management practice because of its potential for climate change mitigation and crop yield improvement. However, the net effect of NT (relative to CT) was influenced by several environmental and agronomic factors (climatic conditions, tillage duration, soil texture, pH, crop species). Therefore, agroecological setting must be taken into consideration when conducting a comparative evaluation of different tillage practices.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know