Observation of the winter regional evaporative fraction using a UAV-based eddy covariance system over wetland area
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, ISSN: 0168-1923, Vol: 310, Page: 108619
2021
- 9Citations
- 22Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The observation of regional evaporative fraction (EF) over a heterogeneous area is crucial to surface energy balance modeling and satellite-based evapotranspiration (ET) validation over complex areas. However, regional EF observations are often lacking or not directly acquired because the sparse distribution and inadequate spatial representativeness of ground measurements cannot represent the region's heterogeneity in landscape and land-surface processes. The UAV-based eddy-covariance (EC) system can be used to observe the regional EF at large areas. UAV-based EC measurements were performed in December 2020 at around 90 m above the ground level over Yancheng coastal wetland, which included 7 flights for comparison with ground EC measurements and 4 flights for investigating the regional EF. The results of comparison showed that the sensible and latent heat fluxes from UAV were consistent with those measured from the ground, with the R2 of 0.84, RMSE of 15.7 W/m 2, bias of 50.7 W/m 2 for sensible heat flux, and the R2 of 0.77, RMSE of 13.1 W/m 2, bias of -3.67 W/m 2 for latent heat flux. Then, 53 flux observations were obtained from the 4 regional flights after applying a quality filter. A footprint model in conjunction with a high-resolution land cover map were used to determine the fluxes contribution source areas and to determine the accumulated footprint weight of the various land cover classes within the footprint areas. Thirdly, a multiple linear regression model was used to dis-aggregate the observed fluxes into component land-cover-class-specific fluxes, and to resolve the EF of each land cover class. The dis-aggregation results revealed that cropland had the highest EF (0.69 ± 0.11), followed by Spartina alterniflora (0.3 ± 0.11) and Phragmites australis (0.27 ± 0.09). Lastly, the EF of Phragmites australis was compared with ground measurement and had a relative error of 2.9%, demonstrating that the UAV-based EC system provided a reliable observation of regional EF.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192321003051; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108619; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85113737489&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168192321003051; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108619
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know