The subsidy-mosaic for agricultural weather insurance in Germany
Agricultural Systems, ISSN: 0308-521X, Vol: 225, Page: 104289
2025
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The subsidisation of agricultural weather insurance is gaining momentum in European agriculture, with the aim of increasing farmers' self-responsibility and eliminating the need for ad hoc disaster payments. The implementation and design of agricultural weather insurance subsidies vary considerably from country to country. We show here that in Germany there are even fundamental differences within the country due to the different weather insurance subsidy schemes of the federal states. For example, some federal states do not subsidise weather insurance, and other federal states that do subsidise weather insurance, differ in which crops or perils are supported. This insurance subsidy mosaic increases inequality across farms and is likely to increase the cost of insurance. In addition, small federal-state-specific insurance markets are less attractive to insurance companies, which has a negative impact on competition among insurance companies and innovation in insurance products. We conclude that harmonised approaches to insurance support that incentivise on-farm risk management and adaptation to climate change are needed.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know