Partitioning evapotranspiration by measuring soil water evaporation with heat-pulse sensors and plant transpiration with sap flow gauges
Agricultural Water Management, ISSN: 0378-3774, Vol: 252, Page: 106883
2021
- 25Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Understanding the contributions of soil water evaporation ( E ) and crop transpiration ( T ) to evapotranspiration ( ET ) is essential for irrigation management and improving crop water use efficiency. Current methods for partitioning ET are subject to uncertainties, due in part to the scale differences in determining E, T, and ET. In this study, ET of a lysimeter planted with maize ( Zea mays L.) was partitioned into E and T using sensors that had compatible measurement scales: E was measured with heat pulse sensors (following the sensible heat balance (SHB) and modified sensible heat balance (MSHB) approaches), and T was measured with sap flow gauges (following the heat-balance sap-flow (HBSF) method). The accuracy of the measurements was evaluated by comparing the sum of E and T values ( E + T ) to weighing lysimeter ET data. During the study period, E, T, and ET had average values of 0.9, 4.0, and 4.8 mm d −1, respectively, and the fractions of E and T were 19% and 81% of E + T, respectively. In general, the E + T values agreed well with the lysimeter ET data, but slight overestimations and underestimations were observed at relatively small and relatively large ET rates, respectively. By combining the SHB and MSHB approaches and the HBSF method, it is possible to partition ET into E and T with satisfactory accuracy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421001487; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106883; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104595424&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378377421001487; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106883
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know