Identification and early anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation in the emergency department
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, ISSN: 0735-6757, Vol: 44, Page: 315-322
2021
- 2Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures36
- Readers36
- 36
Article Description
Emergency departments (ED) in the United States see more than half a million atrial fibrillation visits a year, however guideline recommended anticoagulation is prescribed in <55% of eligible patients. The purpose of this study was to measure guideline recommended anticoagulation prescribing in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) presenting to the ED, with the goal of closing any treatment gap established. We conducted an observational, prospective cohort study in consecutive patients presenting to the ED with a diagnosis of NVAF. CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were calculated and used as predefined criteria to establish guideline-based oral anticoagulation compliance in comparing routine care (baseline cohort) versus a multidisciplinary team approach. Transition of Care (TOC) services and follow-up were also provided in the multidisciplinary cohort. The primary endpoint was to compare the proportion of patients on guideline based oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy at admission and discharge between the groups. In the Baseline Cohort (BC) ( n = 99), 62.3% of patients with a moderate-high risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2) were discharged on guideline-based OAC therapy versus 87.8% in the Multidisciplinary Team Cohort (MTC) ( n = 131), a 25.5% overall improvement for appropriate anticoagulation ( p -value <.001, 95% CI (0.14–0.37)). A multidisciplinary team approach with TOC services for the identification and early intervention of NVAF patients at risk of stroke in the ED can significantly improve the percentage of moderate to high-risk patients that are discharged home with guideline based OAC.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675720302473; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.019; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85083726321&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32331958; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735675720302473; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.019
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know