The diagnostic value of sonographic findings in pediatric elbow fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, ISSN: 0735-6757, Vol: 77, Page: 121-131
2024
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Sonography is a beneficial imaging modality for detecting elbow fractures in children, considering the lack of radiation exposure and time efficiency. This systematic review aims to determine the diagnostic value and clinical applicability of sonography and each sonographic finding in detecting pediatric elbow fractures. Pubmed, Scopus, and WOS databases were searched for related original articles until February 25, 2023, and data related to diagnostic performance were extracted. We used the Bivariate model and hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) approach to calculate pooled diagnostic values. Cochrane Q test and I-squared were performed to evaluate heterogeneity. We assessed heterogeneity with meta-regression. Eight studies were included, which involved a total number of 880 patients. According to meta-analysis, sonography demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 97% (91–99%) and specificity of 90% (80–95%), positive likelihood ratio(LR+) of 9.82 (4.59–20.97), and negative likelihood ratio (LR–) of 0.03 (0.01–0.10). For the sonographic posterior fat pad sign as a sole diagnostic sign, we calculated a Pooled Sensitivity of 80% (70–88%), Specificity of 97% (87–99%), LR+ of 28.8 (6–139.3), and LR– of 0.2 (0.13–0.31). Also, lipohemarthrosis demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 80% (70–88%), specificity of 97% (87–99%), LR+ of 28.8 (6–139.3), and LR– of 0.2 (0.13–0.31). The sensitivity of detecting fractures with cortical line disruption was significantly higher in studies that utilized a comprehensive technique compared to a conventional technique. Sonography is a valuable diagnostic tool for the assessment of pediatric elbow injuries, and it can be capable of confirmation or exclusion of the diagnosis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675723007003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.12.021; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85181025347&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38142484; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735675723007003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.12.021
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know