Assisting the infection preventionist: Use of artificial intelligence for health care–associated infection surveillance
American Journal of Infection Control, ISSN: 0196-6553, Vol: 52, Issue: 6, Page: 625-629
2024
- 9Citations
- 51Captures
- 19Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef1
- Captures51
- Readers51
- 51
- Mentions19
- News Mentions19
- News19
Most Recent News
Study Shows How AI Supports HAI Prevention
Earlier this year, researchers at Saint Louis University and the University of Louisville School of Medicine published a proof-of-concept study in the American Journal of
Article Description
Health care–associated infection (HAI) surveillance is vital for safety in health care settings. It helps identify infection risk factors, enhancing patient safety and quality improvement. However, HAI surveillance is complex, demanding specialized knowledge and resources. This study investigates the use of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative large language models, to improve HAI surveillance. We assessed 2 AI agents, OpenAI's chatGPT plus (GPT-4) and a Mixtral 8×7b-based local model, for their ability to identify Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) and Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) from 6 National Health Care Safety Network training scenarios. The complexity of these scenarios was analyzed, and responses were matched against expert opinions. Both AI models accurately identified CLABSI and CAUTI in all scenarios when given clear prompts. Challenges appeared with ambiguous prompts including Arabic numeral dates, abbreviations, and special characters, causing occasional inaccuracies in repeated tests. The study demonstrates AI's potential in accurately identifying HAIs like CLABSI and CAUTI. Clear, specific prompts are crucial for reliable AI responses, highlighting the need for human oversight in AI-assisted HAI surveillance. AI shows promise in enhancing HAI surveillance, potentially streamlining tasks, and freeing health care staff for patient-focused activities. Effective AI use requires user education and ongoing AI model refinement.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655324000774; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.02.007; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189103122&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38483430; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0196655324000774; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.02.007
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know