The effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, ISSN: 0889-5406, Vol: 157, Issue: 3, Page: 290-304
2020
- 38Citations
- 120Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations38
- Citation Indexes38
- 38
- CrossRef29
- Captures120
- Readers120
- 120
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Review Description
Minimally invasive micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) look promising for a routine acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). The objective of this research was to systematically evaluate evidence regarding the effects of MOPs on the OTM rate, treatment duration, and associated complications. Electronic database and hand search of English literature in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, and clinical trial.gov, with author clarification were performed. The selection criteria were randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing MOPs with conventional treatment involving both extraction and nonextraction. Cochrane's risk of bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach were used for quality assessment. Studies were analyzed with chi-square–based Q statistic methods, I 2 index, fixed-effects, and random-effects model. Quantitative analysis was done on homogenous studies using Review Manager. Eight RCTs were included for the qualitative analysis. Meta-analysis of 2 homogenous studies indicated insignificant effect with MOPs (0.01 mm less OTM; 95% CI, 0.13-0.11; P = 0.83). No difference ( P >0.05) was found in anchorage loss, root resorption, gingival recession, and pain. Meta-analysis of 2 low–risk of bias studies showed no effect with single application MOPs over a short observation period; however, the overall evidence was low. The quality of evidence for MOP side effects ranged from high to low. Future studies are suggested to investigate repeated MOPs effect over the entire treatment duration for different models of OTM and its related biological changes. Trial registration number: PROSPERO CDR42019118642.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540619308601; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.10.009; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85079850088&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32115107; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0889540619308601; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.10.009
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know