The significance of base deficit in acidemic term neonates
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ISSN: 0002-9378, Vol: 213, Issue: 3, Page: 373.e1-373.e7
2015
- 54Citations
- 65Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations54
- Citation Indexes53
- 53
- CrossRef36
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures65
- Readers65
- 65
Article Description
Much emphasis is placed on the metabolic component of umbilical cord acidemia at birth, with an importance attached to an arterial level of <7.00 accompanied by a base deficit of 12 mmol/L. We hypothesized that in acidemic neonates, the level of arterial base deficit provides no prognostic information beyond that provided by the level of arterial pH. This is a cohort study using a database of deliveries from a major teaching hospital, with additional information from neonatal records. A total of 8797 term, singleton, nonanomalous neonates were identified who had paired and validated cord blood gas analysis. Of these, 520 were acidemic (pH <7.1) and 84 were severely acidemic (pH <7.0). Outcomes examined were encephalopathy grade 2/3 and/or death, Apgar <7 at 5 minutes, neonatal unit admission, and composite outcomes of neurological and systemic involvement. Hierarchical logistic regressions were done using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 (Armonk, NY) to assess the predictive value of arterial pH and arterial base deficit. For each outcome the median pH and base deficit of those neonates affected by the adverse outcome was significantly lower than for those who were unaffected. Hierarchical logistic regressions showed that pH is a significant predictor of all adverse outcomes studied ( P <.001 for all outcomes). When base deficit, and then the cross-product, are added to the model, neither add predictive value. In acidemic neonates, the metabolic component does not predict those at risk of adverse outcomes once pH is taken into account. The apparently worse outcomes with greater base deficit simply reflect a greater degree of acidemia. The prognostic significance attached to the base deficit among acidemic neonates is questionable.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937815003324; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.051; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84940427115&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25827502; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002937815003324; http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(15)00332-4/abstract
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know