Characteristic clinical features of maxillofacial injuries encountered over 16-year period – Retrospective study
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology, ISSN: 2212-5558, Vol: 34, Issue: 6, Page: 683-689
2022
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The causes of maxillofacial fractures and their characteristics differ throughout the world. The aim of the present study was to survey and evaluate the characteristics of maxillofacial fractures in cases treated at our institution. The records of patients with maxillofacial fractures treated during a 16-year period were examined. The survey items included sex, age, number of affected patients by year and month, cause of injury, consultation route, time between injury and initial examination, fracture site, and treatment strategy. There were 246 males and 100 females, for a male-female ratio of approximately 2.5:1, and average age was 37.4 years (range 0–93 years). By year, the number of cases was highest in 2017 and lowest in 2012, while by month, May showed the highest and January the lowest numbers. The most common cause of injury was a fall. When cause was examined in accordance with age, the number related to assault was high among young people and that related to a fall was high among elderly, with the overall rate because of a fall high since 2013. Injuries related to assault were increased in April and May, while those related sports activities were high in August. The most common fracture site was the condyle, with open reduction and internal fixation the treatment strategy most often chosen. Maxillofacial fractures treated in our department were primarily related to patient activity, with higher rates noted during the warm weather season and decrease following a large earthquake.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212555822000655; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoms.2022.03.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128253009&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212555822000655; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoms.2022.03.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know