Match making in complex social networks
Applied Mathematics and Computation, ISSN: 0096-3003, Vol: 371, Page: 124928
2020
- 7Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Match making is of significant importance in some social systems. People may need to seek for romantic partners, teammates, collaborators, etc. In this paper, we propose a minimalist framework of match making in complex networks. Specially we adopt a simple model where each individual would greedily seek for making a match with the strongest partner within his/her social connection range. We explore a few matching schemes including greedy mode, roulette wheel selection mode and completely random mode on different networks. We also investigate when social systems become more densely connected, how the match making process would be affected. Our observations show that, in a more densely connected social network, individuals’ efforts for seeking for matches with the strongest partners would be more likely to end up with matching with someone similar to themselves. Meanwhile, the cost of such an approach may be quickly increased. The implications of such observations in real-life systems and open problems are briefly discussed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300319309208; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2019.124928; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076185207&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0096300319309208; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2019.124928
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know