Blood Pressure Lowering Only or More? Has the Jury Reached Its Verdict?
The American Journal of Cardiology, ISSN: 0002-9149, Vol: 100, Issue: 3, Page: S32-S37
2007
- 10Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef5
- Captures28
- Readers28
- 28
Article Description
There is a great need for antihypertensive agents that go beyond blood pressure lowering to treat the underlying pathophysiologic conditions that contribute to cardiovascular disease. However, the results of published outcome studies have been variable because they have investigated patients with complicated, high-risk hypertension. Although this ensures a sufficient number of cardiovascular events to demonstrate drug–drug differences, the potent effects of blood pressure lowering in high-risk patients obscures differential non–blood pressure effects. Despite these limitations, reductions in the risk of stroke, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes mellitus have been demonstrated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade. Guidelines currently recommend thiazide diuretics in stage 1 hypertension, but this is based on data from high-risk patients, and extrapolation to stage 1 disease may not be appropriate. Both blood pressure and cardiovascular risk increase exponentially from early in a patient’s life, leading to clinically relevant differences in the pathophysiology of stage 1 versus complicated hypertension. Importantly, patients with stage 1 hypertension typically require 30–40 years of treatment. Thus, secondary effects of antihypertensive drugs on various blood pressure–independent cardiovascular risk factors are likely to become manifest. Clinical trials in mild forms of hypertension are essential to investigate the non–blood pressure effects of antihypertensive agents.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914907009757; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.05.012; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34547136713&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17666196; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002914907009757; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.05.012
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know