PET/CT for perforator identification in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest
American Journal of Otolaryngology, ISSN: 0196-0709, Vol: 46, Issue: 1, Page: 104593
2025
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
CT angiography (CTA) is used for preoperative localization in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, but is an additional costly study that involves contrast and radiation exposure. Many patients with head and neck cancer already undergo PET/CT. We investigated if PET/CT could be used to preoperatively localize perforators and if this corresponded with the intraoperative location. This was a prospective cohort study at an academic tertiary care center between 2017 and 2022. Participants were adults with head and neck cancer who had undergone PET/CT and were scheduled to undergo reconstruction with DIEP flaps. The mean difference between the preoperative and intraoperative horizontal and vertical distance of perforators from the umbilicus was determined. Preoperative and intraoperative measurements were obtained from 42 perforators (30 patients). The mean difference between preoperative and intraoperative measurements was not statistically significant for HDU (−0.05 with 95 % CI [−0.11, 0.01], p = 0.13) or VDU (−0.02 with 95 % CI [−0.06, 0.03] p = 0.41). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated limits of agreement of −0.42 (95 % CI [−0.52, −0.31]) to 0.33 (95 % CI [0.23, 0.43]) for HDU and −0.31 (95 % CI [−0.39, −0.23]) to 0.27 (95 % CI [0.19, 0.35]) for VDU. This was within our chosen limit of agreement of 1 cm. Preoperative identification of DIEP perforators on PET/CT can be used to locate perforators intraoperatively. Utilizing this method facilitates efficient flap harvesting and does not require an additional imaging study since many patients undergo PET/CT.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019607092400379X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104593; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85213264267&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39733646; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S019607092400379X
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know