Substitution of fish meal by fermented soybean meal affects the growth performance and flesh quality of Japanese seabass ( Lateolabrax japonicus )
Animal Feed Science and Technology, ISSN: 0377-8401, Vol: 229, Page: 1-12
2017
- 82Citations
- 101Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A 16-week growth trial was conducted to study the effects of replacing dietary super prime fish meal (FM) with fermented soybean meal (FSM) in Japanese seabass ( Lateolabrax japonicus ). The outcome of the trial was assessed using the digestible optimum amino acid (DIAA) profile of growth performance and flesh quality of the fish (initial body weight = 13.3 g ± 0.1 g). Four diets that were isoenergetic and isonitrogenous were formulated. A commercial formula containing 36% FM was assigned as the control diet (named here FM). In the other 3 diets, 25%, 50% or 75% of the FM was replaced with FSM, in which lysine (Lys), methionine (Met), and threonine (Thr) were balanced as in the control diet using crystallized amino acids (these diets were named FSM25, FSM50 and FSM75, respectively). Fish were sampled at 8 and 16 weeks. Flesh quality clustering analysis was conducted by Near Infrared (NIR) Spectrometry. The analyses showed that the feeding rate, specific growth rate, feed conversion ratio, protein productive value, energy productive value, and body composition did not differ between the FM and FSM25 groups ( P> 0.05); however, both groups performed significantly better than the other groups ( P< 0.05). Fish fed the FSM75 diet showed a very low growth performance and a high mortality rate in the first 8 weeks, and this treatment was therefore discontinued. Japanese seabass adapted to the FSM50 diet (180 g kg −1 FM) after 8 weeks of feeding, and compensatory feeding and growth occurred to give this group a higher growth rate; however, the flesh quality was poorer than those of the FM and FSM25 groups. There is a great potential to apply NIR spectrum to classify the flesh quality of fish fed with different protein sources.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840117303942; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.03.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85019997883&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0377840117303942; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.03.006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know