Effects of estrus synchronization using Matrix ® followed by treatment with the GnRH agonist triptorelin to control ovulation in mature gilts
Animal Reproduction Science, ISSN: 0378-4320, Vol: 185, Page: 66-74
2017
- 12Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef9
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Article Description
Estrus and ovulation responses in Matrix-treated gilts may affect ovulation synchrony in response to triptorelin. In experiment 1, estrus and ovulation measures at 12 h intervals after last Matrix feeding (LMF) were analyzed. For the 398 gilts that displayed estrus, 87.4% were detected on Days 6–8 after LMF. Duration of estrus was 24–60 h for 85.6% of gilts and negatively correlated with interval from LMF to estrus (r = −0.53, P< 0.0001). The estrus to ovulation interval was positively correlated with duration of estrus (r = 0.61, P< 0.0001). In experiment 2, gilts (n = 96) received intravaginal treatment with 2 mL of gel containing placebo (Control) at 96 h, 200 μg of triptorelin at 96 h (TRP96), 120 h (TRP120) or 144 h (TRP144) after LMF. Estrus measures did not differ ( P> 0.10) among treatments. The proportion of gilts ovulating 32–56 h after treatment was greater for TRP120 and TRP144 ( P< 0.01) compared to other treatments. The treatment to ovulation intervals for all triptorelin treatments were shorter ( P< 0.001) than Control. In experiment 3, gilts (n = 86) received placebo (Control), 100 μg (TRP100), 200 μg (TRP200), or 400 μg (TRP400) of triptorelin at 120 h after LMF. There was no effect of treatment ( P> 0.10) on estrus or on interval from LMF to estrus. The proportion of gilts ovulating by 40, 48 and 56 h after treatment increased ( P< 0.05) with triptorelin compared to Control. Our results indicate that gilts receiving 100–400 μg of triptorelin at 120 h after LMF had the greatest ovulation synchrony 24–48 h following treatment. These studies provide important information for developing a procedure for a single insemination in synchronized gilts.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378432017304657; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.08.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85027436050&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28823417; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378432017304657; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.08.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know