Clinicopathological analysis of a type of “low grade” poorly cohesive gastric adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified with a good prognosis
Annals of Diagnostic Pathology, ISSN: 1092-9134, Vol: 63, Page: 152105
2023
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Poorly cohesive carcinoma not otherwise specified (PCGCA-NOS) is regarded in the most recent WHO classification as a high-grade malignancy; however, some cases may be associated with a relatively good prognosis. We have studied a series of 115 cases of PCGCA-NOS and were able to identify low-grade features in 14 cases based on three morphological manifestations. Immunohistochemical staining, EBER in situ hybridization, Feulgen staining and flow cytometry were employed. Among the 115 cases of PCGAC-NOS, 14 cases met the criteria of “low grade”, accounting for 12.2 %. The “low grade” cases exhibited more shallow invasion and less lymph node metastasis (both P < 0.05); showed less frequent expression of MUC5AC, E-cadherin and p53 (all P < 0.05). Moreover, “low grade” PCGAC-NOS had a lower proliferative index( P < 0.001). We also found that the DNA content was lower in the “low grade” group, and aneuploidy was not detected in the “low grade” group, which was sharply different from the control group (50 %). Last, “low grade” PCGAC-NOS had a more favorable prognosis. A small subset of PCGAC-NOS cases have a low grade nature, and the clinicopathological features, immunophenotypes, and cytogenetics of these “low grade” cases differ from those of traditional PCGAC-NOS.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1092913423000023; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2023.152105; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85145702351&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36621077; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1092913423000023; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2023.152105
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know