PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Shale gas and non-aqueous fracturing fluids: Opportunities and challenges for supercritical CO 2

Applied Energy, ISSN: 0306-2619, Vol: 147, Page: 500-509
2015
  • 751
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 313
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 35
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    751
    • Citation Indexes
      743
    • Policy Citations
      8
      • Policy Citation
        8
  • Captures
    313
  • Social Media
    35
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      35
      • Facebook
        35

Article Description

Hydraulic fracturing of shale formations in the United States has led to a domestic energy boom. Currently, water is the only fracturing fluid regularly used in commercial shale oil and gas production. Industry and researchers are interested in non-aqueous working fluids due to their potential to increase production, reduce water requirements, and to minimize environmental impacts. Using a combination of new experimental and modeling data at multiple scales, we analyze the benefits and drawbacks of using CO 2 as a working fluid for shale gas production. We theorize and outline potential advantages of CO 2 including enhanced fracturing and fracture propagation, reduction of flow-blocking mechanisms, increased desorption of methane adsorbed in organic-rich parts of the shale, and a reduction or elimination of the deep re-injection of flow-back water that has been linked to induced seismicity and other environmental concerns. We also examine likely disadvantages including costs and safety issues associated with handling large volumes of supercritical CO 2. The advantages could have a significant impact over time leading to substantially increased gas production. In addition, if CO 2 proves to be an effective fracturing fluid, then shale gas formations could become a major utilization option for carbon sequestration.

Bibliographic Details

Richard S. Middleton; J. William Carey; Robert P. Currier; Jeffrey D. Hyman; Qinjun Kang; Satish Karra; Joaquín Jiménez-Martínez; Mark L. Porter; Hari S. Viswanathan

Elsevier BV

Engineering; Energy; Environmental Science

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know