Shale gas and non-aqueous fracturing fluids: Opportunities and challenges for supercritical CO 2
Applied Energy, ISSN: 0306-2619, Vol: 147, Page: 500-509
2015
- 751Citations
- 313Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Hydraulic fracturing of shale formations in the United States has led to a domestic energy boom. Currently, water is the only fracturing fluid regularly used in commercial shale oil and gas production. Industry and researchers are interested in non-aqueous working fluids due to their potential to increase production, reduce water requirements, and to minimize environmental impacts. Using a combination of new experimental and modeling data at multiple scales, we analyze the benefits and drawbacks of using CO 2 as a working fluid for shale gas production. We theorize and outline potential advantages of CO 2 including enhanced fracturing and fracture propagation, reduction of flow-blocking mechanisms, increased desorption of methane adsorbed in organic-rich parts of the shale, and a reduction or elimination of the deep re-injection of flow-back water that has been linked to induced seismicity and other environmental concerns. We also examine likely disadvantages including costs and safety issues associated with handling large volumes of supercritical CO 2. The advantages could have a significant impact over time leading to substantially increased gas production. In addition, if CO 2 proves to be an effective fracturing fluid, then shale gas formations could become a major utilization option for carbon sequestration.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261915003074; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.023; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84925259283&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306261915003074; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.023
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know