Robust optimal operation of energy hub incorporating integrated thermal and electrical demand response programs under various electric vehicle charging modes
Applied Energy, ISSN: 0306-2619, Vol: 321, Page: 119344
2022
- 23Citations
- 52Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Although the energy hub (EH) concept results in different benefits, the system uncertainties might affect the optimized decisions. Several studies have studied EH’s optimal operation, considering the system uncertainties. However, there is a research gap in proposing a novel EH’s robust optimal operation under various charging modes of electric vehicles (EVs), besides integrated electrical and thermal demand response programs (DRPs). The main purpose of this research is to fill such a knowledge gap. In this paper, the uncertainties of renewable energy distributed resources and electricity price have been concerned using the robust optimization method. The integrated charging load of EVs under coordinated and uncoordinated charging modes has been distinguished using the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). Another contribution is to study different schemes of hybrid electrical, heat, and cooling energy storage systems in the introduced robust framework. Simulation results infer that a 15.87% decrement in EH’s operation cost is achievable by applying the integrated thermal and electrical DRPs, using the electric heat pump (EHP) and hybrid storage system consisting of the ice storage system. The comparative test results show that the advantages of integrated thermal and electricity DRPs and charging management of EVs are highlighted by using EHPs. The sensitivity analyses of the EH’s operation cost against the robustness efficiency parameters corresponding to the uncertainty level show that the advantages of the proposed method are highlighted while the EH’s uncertainties increase.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922006900; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119344; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85131947615&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306261922006900; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119344
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know