Bone Marrow Edema Syndrome of the Medial Femoral Condyle Treated With Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: A Clinical and MRI Retrospective Comparative Study
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, ISSN: 0003-9993, Vol: 99, Issue: 5, Page: 873-879
2018
- 20Citations
- 63Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations20
- Citation Indexes20
- 20
- CrossRef9
- Captures63
- Readers63
- 63
Article Description
To determine the validity of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of bone marrow edema (BME) of the medial condyle of the knee. Retrospective. Orthopedic Surgery outpatient clinic. Symptomatic patients (N=56) affected by BME of the medial condyle of the knee. Patients were equally divided into an ESWT-treated group and a control group, which was managed conservatively. ESWT delivery to the medial condyle of the affected knee. Clinical and functional assessment of the knee was performed with the use of the clinical and functional scores of the Knee Society Score (KSS). Pain was measured with the visual analog scale (VAS). BME area was measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before treatment and at 4 months' follow-up. Clinical evaluation of patients at final follow-up of 4 months posttreatment showed a significant improvement ( P <.0001) of symptoms and knee functionality, both for range of motion and strength in both groups. VAS values were significantly improved ( P <.0001) in both groups, with 3 patients in the ESWT group being pain-free (VAS=0) at 4 months' follow-up. At 4 months, MRI assessments on both sagittal and coronal views showed a significant reduction in BME in the ESWT group compared with the control group. Our findings show that ESWT is a valid nonpharmacologic and noninvasive therapy for spontaneous BME of the medial condyle that improves the affected vascular and metabolic state present in this pathologic disorder through its metabolic mechanisms of action.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999317313928; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.025; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85041298250&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29223709; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003999317313928; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.025
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know