The dynamic evolution characteristics of PM 2.5 concentrations and health risk assessment during typical forest fires in China
Atmospheric Pollution Research, ISSN: 1309-1042, Vol: 15, Issue: 12, Page: 102303
2024
- 1Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In the context of climate change, increasingly frequent wildfire events are exacerbating the air quality crisis in China and have become a significant source of atmospheric PM 2.5. This study selected 12 major forest wildfire events in China from 2018 to 2023. Using atmospheric pollutant and component concentration data, as well as meteorological data, the study employed MK trend analysis, forward trajectory simulation, potential source contribution function (PSCF), and health risk indices to investigate the evolution patterns of PM 2.5 concentrations before and after each wildfire event. The study explored the driving role of meteorological factors in this evolution process and quantitatively analyzed the spatial distribution characteristics of health risks in surrounding cities post-wildfire. The results indicated that: 1) PM 2.5 levels changed significantly before and after each wildfire event, although the proportion of components remained relatively stable. 2) PM 2.5 concentrations exhibited varying characteristics within different buffer zones of the wildfire areas. In the forest wildfire events in Foshan, Guangdong Province, and Jinzhong, Shanxi Province, the average PM 2.5 concentrations within the 50 km buffer zones reached approximately 90 μg/m 3, about 4–5 times the multi-year average for these areas. 3) Wildfire emissions were mainly influenced by meteorological and topographical factors. Wind field dependence diagrams showed that PM 2.5 tended to accumulate in all wind directions, particularly at lower wind speeds of 0–5 m/s 4) Potential source analysis revealed that PM 2.5 emissions from wildfires posed significant risks to surrounding areas. Multiple events had high-risk areas (WPSCF ≥0.8), and among the cities in these high-risk areas, the health risk value (ΔM) for Ya'an City reached an extremely high 85.1. This study provides a theoretical basis for policymakers to develop locally tailored wildfire management policies, ensuring the protection of the public's right to breathe clean air.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know