Experience of the Hybrid technique for breast cancer planning in an oncology care center in Lima-Peru
Applied Radiation and Isotopes, ISSN: 0969-8043, Vol: 190, Page: 110463
2022
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures4
- Readers4
Article Description
To investigate, describe and evaluate the dosimetric parameters of the hybrid technique as a combination of the 3D Irregular Surface Compensator (3D-ISC) technique and modulated volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) for breast cancer planning. The study involved planning a patient with left breast cancer. Planning was carried out with 3D-ISC, VMAT and Hybrid techniques. The 3 techniques were compared with respect to the target volume (PTV), coverage, gradient and protection of organs at risk (OARs). The Eclipse version 13.6 planning system was used and the prescription of the dose obeyed the hypofractionated scheme of 40.05Gy in 15 sessions (267 cGy per fraction) followed by a 13.35Gy boost in 5 sessions. The tangential field technique was the one with the lowest dose values delivered to healthy organs. However, with respect to the gradient, the VMAT technique was better. The Hybrid technique was the balance between the 3D-ISC and VMAT technique because after the evaluation of dosimetric parameters for both the OARs and the PTV coverage, values were found within the limits allowed according to the RTOG. The hybrid 3D-ISC and VMAT technique can be considered as a viable option for breast planning, achieving better control in OARs without losing priority over PTV coverage in addition to obtaining a good plan quality.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969804322003487; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110463; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85139352344&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36215806; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0969804322003487; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110463
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know