Motivación por el servicio público de los profesionales de los centros de atención primaria: ¿qué es más importante el entorno o el apoyo directivo?
Atención Primaria, ISSN: 0212-6567, Vol: 53, Issue: 4, Page: 101995
2021
- 4Citations
- 80Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- Captures80
- Readers80
- 46
- 32
Article Description
Explicar la Motivación por el Servicio Público de los profesionales sanitarios a partir de (a) el entorno social de su centro de trabajo y (b) el apoyo percibido por parte de sus supervisores. Estudio observacional, de corte transversal, cuantitativo, retrospectivo, y no controlado. 40 centros de atención primaria pertenecientes al área de salud de Gran Canaria. Atención primaria. 605 profesionales sanitarios de centros de atención primaria. 46% médicos y 54% enfermeros. Muestreo no probabilístico por conveniencia con tasa de respuesta del 53,3%. La variable dependiente es la Motivación por el Servicio Público de los profesionales sanitarios. Las variables independientes son el entorno social de los centros de atención primaria y el apoyo percibido por parte de los superiores. Los datos se analizaron mediante regresión lineal multinivel y regresión lineal múltiple. Las variables del entorno de los centros de salud: renta de la población, porcentaje de personas mayores de 65 años, y la cantidad de población asignada a los centros, no influyen en la Motivación por el Servicio Público de los profesionales sanitarios. Por el contrario, el apoyo que estos perciben por parte de sus superiores sí impacta de forma significativa tanto en el factor compasión (β: 0,38; IC: 0,21-0,32) como en el compromiso por el interés público (β: 0,37; IC: 0,20-0,31). El apoyo percibido por parte del supervisor ejerce una influencia significativa sobre la Motivación por el Servicio Público de los profesionales sanitarios. Sin embargo, el entorno social no afecta a este tipo de motivación. Explain the Public Service Motivation of health professionals based on (a) the social environment of their workplace and (b) the perceived supervisor support. Observational, cross-sectional, quantitative, retrospective, and uncontrolled study. Forty primary care centers belonging to the Gran Canaria health area, primary care. Six hundred and five health professionals from primary care centers. 46% doctors and 54% nurses. Non-probability convenience sampling with a response rate of 53.3%. The dependent variable is the Public Service Motivation of health professionals. The independent variables are the social environment of the primary care centers and the perceived supervisor support. Data were analyzed using multilevel linear regression and multiple linear regression. The following variables of the environment of the healthcare centers: income of the population, percentage of people older than 65 years, and the amount of population assigned to the centers, do not influence the Public Service Motivation of health professionals. On the contrary, the support they receive from their superiors does have a significant impact on both the compassion factor ( β : 0.38; CI: 0.21–0.32) and the commitment to the public interest ( β : 0.37; CI: 0.20–0.31). The perceived supervisor support has a significant influence on the Public Service Motivation of health professionals. However, the social environment does not affect this type of motivation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0212656721000299; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.101995; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85102121992&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33711773; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0212656721000299; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.101995
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know