Light-matter interaction in tungsten Sulfide-based Janus monolayers: A First-Principles study
Applied Surface Science, ISSN: 0169-4332, Vol: 599, Page: 153967
2022
- 6Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We employed a first-principles study based on DFT to predict five new tungsten sulfide-based Janus monolayers: WSC, WSN, WSP, WSAs, and WSO compared with WS 2, WSSe, and WSTe monolayers. Our calculations revealed that WSC and WSO monolayers are stable with semiconducting nature, while WSN, WSP, and WSAs demonstrated extreme instability. The WSC Janus was more attractive with a band structure between WS 2 monolayer and graphene. Also, the great spin splitting in the VB in all the stable structures was interesting. Moreover, we investigated light-matter interaction, and remarkably we predicted Raman modes, static dielectric constant, static refractive index, and skin depth for stable Janus monolayers. Importantly, our results indicated an anisotropic response of various Janus monolayers with different sensitivity to light. Our calculation showed that not only the Janus structures based on chalcogens could be stable, but also WS-based Janus structures from other groups can be. Due to their novel properties, these new Janus monolayers, especially WSC, can prepare new opportunities for electronic, optoelectronic, and photonic applications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169433222015094; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153967; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85132727338&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169433222015094; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153967
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know