Are deciduous upper molars and lower canines useful for sex estimation?
Archives of Oral Biology, ISSN: 0003-9969, Vol: 165, Page: 106006
2024
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
This paper investigates whether deciduous upper molars and lower canines have sexual dimorphic features, exploring these teeth' dimensions and the presence of Zuckerkandl’s tubercle and Carabelli’s cusp on the first and second upper molars. We analyzed 64 pairs of dental plaster casts from 34 females and 30 males aged between 3 and 12 years. We measured the first and second deciduous upper molars and the lower deciduous canines (maximum mesiodistal and buccolingual length), and we registered the presence of the Zuckerkandl’s tubercle and the Carabelli’s cusp on the first and second upper molars, respectively. Regarding the differentiation between sexes using Carabelli’s cusp and Zuckerkandl’s tubercle, the classification was not independent of Carabelli’s cusp presence only for tooth 65 (p = 0.035). In all other teeth, whether for Carabelli’s cusp or Zuckerkandl’s tubercle, their presence was similar for both sexes. There were statistically significant differences between sexes (p < 0.05) for the buccolingual measurements of both upper second molars, the first right upper molar, and the right canine. The developed model allowed for a 64.1% accuracy in sex estimation. The study suggests that while Carabelli’s cusp and Zuckerkandl’s tubercle in upper deciduous molars don't consistently differ between sexes, tooth size, particularly the buccolingual measurements of certain teeth, including upper deciduous molars and lower canines, may provide a more reliable criterion for sex estimation. The developed model depicted moderate accuracy, underscoring the need for a multifactorial approach when estimating sex from skeletal remains. It suggests that while dental features can contribute to sex estimation, they should be used in conjunction with other skeletal or molecular markers to improve accuracy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003996924001274; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2024.106006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85194307663&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38810388; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003996924001274; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2024.106006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know