PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Association of F 2 -isoprostane levels with Alzheimer’s disease in observational studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ageing Research Reviews, ISSN: 1568-1637, Vol: 74, Page: 101552
2022
  • 6
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 12
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Most Recent News

Association of F2-isoprostane levels with Alzheimer's disease in observational studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ageing Res Rev. 2021 Dec 24;74:101552. Authors: Trares K, Chen LJ, Schöttker B PubMed: 34954419 Submit Comment

Review Description

The association between F 2 -isoprostanes and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been controversially discussed in the literature since the 1990s. However, no systematic review has been performed so far. A systematic review of observational studies on the associations of F 2 -isoprostanes and the specific biomarker 8-iso-prostaglandin F 2α with AD were conducted. Random-effects model meta-analyses were performed. 29 studies were included in the systematic review, including four longitudinal studies. In an overall meta-analysis of the 25 cross-sectional studies, F 2 -isoprostane levels were statistically significantly associated with AD (Hedge’s g [95% confidence interval]: 1.00 [0.69–1.32]). When studies were grouped by biomarker and sample specimen, F 2 -isoprostane and 8-iso-prostaglandin F 2α levels were statistically significantly elevated in tissue samples of the frontal lobe of AD patients. Moreover, F 2 -isoprostane levels in cerebrospinal fluid and 8-iso-prostaglandin F 2α levels in blood samples of AD patients were significantly increased. Meta-analyses of the few longitudinal studies did not reach statistical significance. Increased concentrations of F 2 -isoprostanes were found in AD patients. However, due to the lack of adjustment in most cross-sectional case-control studies, results must be interpreted carefully. In addition, the causality of the association is uncertain because evidence from well-conducted longitudinal studies was conflicting, and further longitudinal studies are required to reinforce the results.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know