Priority weights acquisition of linear uncertain preference relations and its application in the ranking of online shopping platforms
Applied Soft Computing, ISSN: 1568-4946, Vol: 105, Page: 107292
2021
- 5Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The linear uncertain preference relations (LUPRs) uses an uncertain variable to represent the decision-maker’s pairwise comparison judgment of the scheme. The variable is subject to the linear uncertain distribution, which is the extension of the traditional fuzzy preference relations (FPRs) and interval fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs). This paper proposes a group decision modeling problem, constructs the priority weights acquisition models of the additively and multiplicatively consistent LUPRs, and especially solves the problem that the weight solution is negative value or no solution by using traditional methods to acquire weights in consistent FPRs and IFPRs. Based on these two types of consistent structure of LUPRs, this study constructs the crisp number, interval number weight solving models of LUPRs and the group decision ranking models with LUPRs. The results show that these new models are suitable for solving the weight vector of traditional FPRs and IFPRs. The case of online shopping platform selection compares the results obtained by various methods of calculating weights, further illustrating the effectiveness and rationality of the new methods.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494621002155; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107292; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85102891516&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1568494621002155; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107292
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know