Sensitivity analysis approaches in multi-criteria decision analysis: A systematic review
Applied Soft Computing, ISSN: 1568-4946, Vol: 148, Page: 110915
2023
- 48Citations
- 159Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
In the field of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), the deployment of sensitivity analysis has become a fundamental approach to testing the robustness and reliability of the results obtained. Its importance lies in its ability to gain additional insight into potential changes that affect the desirability of the decision variants being evaluated. Through different methodologies, it reveals the vulnerability of results to changes in the underlying data, thus offering valuable information to support decision making. This research paper highlights a compendium of 250 researches involving the application of sensitivity analysis in a multi-criteria context. Using a structured approach of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, this study provides a comprehensive review process. The main objectives are to identify and categorize common sensitivity analysis techniques explained in the literature and to describe a selected framework that facilitates the execution of these techniques. The research demonstrates the importance of sensitivity analysis to enhance the credibility of MCDA outcomes and contributes to the field of decision support.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156849462300933X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110915; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85173530339&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S156849462300933X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110915
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know