A comparison of hesitant fuzzy VIKOR methods for supplier selection
Applied Soft Computing, ISSN: 1568-4946, Vol: 149, Page: 110920
2023
- 10Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Supplier selection is a complex decision-making process which is influenced by uncertainty and DM hesitation. To deal with this problem, various studies have proposed the use of methods based on Fuzzy Set Theory and its extensions. There are several varieties of Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic VIKOR (HFLVIKOR) methods in the literature which can use two or more linguistic terms in each evaluation and can generate solutions based on the group’s utility or individual regret. Despite these benefits, we have not found comparative studies involving HFLVIKOR methods to supplier selection. Given this gap, this study applies and compares Extended Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic VIKOR (EHFLVIKOR) methods and Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set VIKOR (PDHFLVIKOR) methods with Possibility Distributions within the supplier selection context. This application was realized using a service company. We also performed 8 scenario simulations to analyze the effect of including other criteria and alternatives. Despite the identified limitations of each method, we conclude that both are appropriate for dealing with group decision making under uncertainty and require little effort in their data collection. The PDHFLVIKOR results were more consistent in maintaining the ranking and the compromise solution in the real application as well as simulated scenarios. Unlike PDHFLVIKOR, EHFLVIKOR loses information when there is a consensus. On the other hand, because it makes it possible to create subgroups of DMs, EHFLVIKOR appears to be more appropriate for companies in which there is more than one DM involved in supplier selection for each functional area. This study’s results will help managers and academics in selecting the most appropriate method for supplier selection.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494623009389; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110920; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85174901217&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1568494623009389; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110920
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know