Calculation of key parameters of tropospheric mapping function based on random forest method
Advances in Space Research, ISSN: 0273-1177, Vol: 75, Issue: 2, Page: 1825-1839
2025
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
The tropospheric mapping functions (MFs) play a crucial role in estimating the delay of electromagnetic waves as they traverse the troposphere, particularly in space geodetic techniques like GNSS and VLBI, where these waves are the primary measurement tool. Currently, empirical models that rely on non-meteorological parameters are commonly used to calculate MFs, offering convenience but often yielding less accurate results in regions with volatile climates. Such inaccuracies can lead to errors in slant total delays reaching the meter-level, subsequently affecting other data products. Although authoritative bodies periodically release essential meteorological parameters for MF calculation or provide ready-made MF products, these often come with a delay of several days or require specific authorization. To address this, we introduced a method leveraging the random forest (RF) model to rapidly derive key MFs from surface observations. Experimental results indicate that the RF model significantly enhances the accuracy of MFs, with improvements exceeding 60% for the hydrostatic component and over 20% for the wet component, effectively eliminating seasonal systematic deviations; although it is somewhat inferior to the MFs from VMF3-FC, RF does not require an internet connection and can independently train and construct models, making it very suitable for independently operated systems. We further trained a series of RF models using varied sample spaces and analyzed their performance under different combinations of feature dimensions and time spans. This analysis suggests that an optimal balance exists when considering the challenges in acquiring sample data, training time, model size, computational efficiency, and accuracy.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know