Effect of OH radical scavengers on secondary organic aerosol formation from reactions of isoprene with ozone
Atmospheric Environment, ISSN: 1352-2310, Vol: 79, Page: 147-154
2013
- 31Citations
- 52Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In order to understand the effect of OH radical scavengers on secondary organic aerosol formation, aerosol yields from the isoprene ozonolysis were measured in the presence of sufficient amounts of OH radical scavengers. Cyclohexane, CO, n -hexane, and diethyl ether were used as the OH radical scavengers. The aerosol yield was determined to be 0.002–0.023 for experiments without OH radical scavengers in the aerosol mass range 2–120 μg m −3. Similar aerosol yields were observed in experiments using cyclohexane. The aerosol yield observed with n -hexane was close to that observed without scavengers at 120 μg m −3, but this aerosol yield was slightly lower than those observed in reactions without scavengers in the range 3–83 μg m −3. The offline aerosol samples obtained in experiments with cyclohexane or n -hexane contained oxygenated hydrocarbons with six or more carbon atoms. Aerosol formation in experiments that used cyclohexane or n -hexane as the scavenger was enhanced. This was caused by the oxidation products of the OH radical scavengers, although the increase in the yield could not be quantified. The aerosol yields were 0.002–0.014 for experiments with CO and diethyl ether in the aerosol mass range 4–120 μg m −3. The reaction of CO with OH radicals forms HO 2 radicals, whereas the reactions of cyclohexane, n -hexane, and diethyl ether, respectively, with OH radicals form organic peroxy (RO 2 ) radicals. Present results show that the aerosol yield is independent of the HO 2 /RO 2 ratio or that it decreases with increasing HO 2 /RO 2 ratio. Since the HO 2 concentration is much higher than the RO 2 concentration in the atmosphere, the results obtained using CO in this study will be a good approximation of the aerosol yield from the ozonolysis of isoprene in the atmosphere.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231013004949; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.036; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84880385610&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1352231013004949; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.036
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know