Temporal features of concepts are grounded in time perception neural networks: An EEG study
Brain and Language, ISSN: 0093-934X, Vol: 237, Page: 105220
2023
- 6Citations
- 2Usage
- 18Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Article Description
Experimental evidence suggests that modality-specific concept features such as action, motion, and sound partially rely on corresponding action/perception neural networks in the human brain. Little is known, however, about time-related features of concepts. We examined whether temporal features of concepts recruit networks that subserve time perception in the brain in an EEG study using event and object nouns. Results showed significantly larger ERPs for event duration vs object size judgments over right parietal electrodes, a region associated with temporal processing. Additionally, alpha/beta (10–15 Hz) neural oscillation showed a stronger desynchronization for event duration compared to object size in the right parietal electrodes. This difference was not seen in control tasks comparing event vs object valence, suggesting that it is not likely to reflect a general difference between event and object nouns. These results indicate that temporal features of words may be subserved by time perception circuits in the human brain.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X2200150X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105220; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85145266424&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36587493; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0093934X2200150X; https://repository.lsu.edu/comd_pubs/79; https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1078&context=comd_pubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105220
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know